 |
||
 |
||
 |
||
 |
||
 |
||
 |
||
 |
|
Juniper's Provenness Rating System |
|
 |
FULLY PROVEN The process has more than one full commercial reference site that has been operating for at least two years on this feedstock, at a relevant scale. Operational performance has met the client's expectations and the plant has achieved a performance that is consistent with international standards |
 |
PROVEN The process has been proven in sustained commercial operation but in a more limited fashion (the nature of this limitation is described in our comments). |
 |
DEMONSTRATED The integrated process has been demonstrated to operate satisfactorily on the relevant feed material at a pilot or demonstration project, typically in a time-limited trial. |
 |
CONCEPTUAL This rating applies to a process concept for which there is very limited performance data available as yet. |
 |
NOT RATED
For various reasons we may decide not to give a process a rating (eg there may be unsufficient information available at the present time), in each instance the accompanying text will explain the reasons. |
|
|
|
 |
If a rating is (bracketed) this indicates that it has been qualified for some reason, as discussed in the text. |
|||||
 |
An upward pointing arrow indicates that it is anticipated that the rating may be raised in the near future if developments continue as expected (for example: a plant is currently being commissioned) | |||||
 |
An exclamation mark against a rating indicates that Juniper is aware that significant technical, operational or environmental issues were identified at a key reference facility which we believe may be a cause for concern in relation to particular applications | |||||
|
||||||
